When two countries' domestic rules both call you a resident, the risk isn't either country's rules alone — it's the unresolved tie between them. A treaty tie-breaker decides it, not a feeling, and not whichever tax authority asks first.
Following the OECD Model Tax Convention's Article 4, the test runs in order — and stops at the first stage that gives a clear answer.
Where do you have a home available to you on a continuing basis — owned or rented, not a hotel or a relative's spare room? If only one country qualifies, the test stops here.
If a permanent home exists in both — or neither — which country holds your closer personal and economic ties: family, business interests, social and civic life, where your assets actually sit.
If vital interests don't resolve it, the test turns to where you actually spend your time, measured over a meaningful period — not a single tax year in isolation.
Still unresolved? The tie goes to the country whose nationality you hold — one of the few points in tax law where citizenship itself does the deciding.
In the rare case nothing above resolves it, the two countries' tax authorities settle it between themselves — the slowest and least predictable outcome, and the one good planning avoids needing.
Most cases never reach stage 3What's actually moving — you, your income, or your tax residence — and which treaty and tie-breaker stage applies. Free, no charge.
The residence route, the day-count plan, the documented tie-breaker position, and the banking that actually works at the destination.
Annual review as the treaty, your circumstances, or either country's rules change — so the position doesn't quietly go stale.
The full Codex entry on tax-residency tie-breaker rules is still in drafting — this page reflects our current working knowledge of the OECD framework. Browse the Codex →
Done right, this is settled in one place. Done loosely, it's contested across two.
Map your move →